ref: 4d82b20a5f76a56f9dafb714de102ab43cbd18cd
parent: 81e21b2b7f2e3d9569a776690f0728e80605b4b9
author: Erik de Castro Lopo <erikd@miles>
date: Tue Aug 9 09:27:05 EDT 2005
license.html : Assert that dynamic linking implies a derivative work.
--- a/doc/license.html
+++ b/doc/license.html
@@ -95,6 +95,16 @@
</P>
<!-- pepper -->
<P>
+ 2005-08-09 : There is a certain amount of
+ <A HREF="http://www.wordiq.com/definition/GNU_General_Public_License#GPL-related_disputes">
+ debate</A>
+ about whether non-GPL software can dynamically link to GPL libraries.
+ I side with the FSF and assert that an executable dynamically linked
+ to libsamplerate is a derivative work of libsamplerate and is
+ therefore subject to the GNU GPL.
+</P>
+<!-- pepper -->
+<P>
For more information, please see the
<A HREF="http://www.mega-nerd.com/SRC/procedure.html">
commercial use licensing procedure